Many people write or speak to tell us what we should think. Some want to be believed because they are experts, or think they are. Some want to be believed because they claim to speak for us. Some have had revelations. Others want us to trust them because they communicate through prominent media outlets. Many tell us what we should think. I write to encourage my readers to think for themselves. I write to ask you to inquire. Question me. Have fun.

  
Comment of the Day
The Editorial Board should have no opinion

Jul 11, 2020

The WSJ Editorial Board expressed its opinion about the case of Michael Flynn. It does not matter what they said; in my book, the Editorial Board should have no opinion on any topic. Editorial boards’ job is not to lecture, but to facilitate views from individuals who can present valid arguments. The Editorial Board's job at the WSJ is to guarantee to me, a subscriber, that the different opinions presented are fact-checked. I pay a subscription for the WSJ because I do not have the time nor the means to fact-check whatever is written and posted on the internet. I do not pay for the subscription to be brainwashed by whatever the self-anointed authority of the Editorial Board believes is right. I can make my judgment based on the facts and their interpretation by other individuals.

PREVIOUS COMMENTS
More parenting is needed
Aug 01, 2019
Peter Gray in Psychology Today advises for less parenting. The problem is exactly the opposite: There is not enough parenting. In the past, when most of our ancestors lived in self-supporting households, often a farm, out of necessity, children were an integral part of whatever adults needed to do during their daily life, and they learned that way. Now, we do not need to do as much at home. Work is outside the home, food is brought in, heat is turned on and off, and mysteriously magical, colorful screens are the center of most activities. If we leave children free to explore what they find the most attractive, they will play video games. There might be some educational value in it, but one needs to learn much more. Hence, we need more effort in parenting, with parents doing more in the home than is otherwise required, and spending more time with children outside in order to introduce them to the real world. This realization hit home after I witnessed the surprise of a 7-year old seeing apples on my apple tree.
More
Less fight more work
Jul 30, 2017

The fight over Obamacare repeal is over, at least for now. The GOP can start to work on a new proposal that each of us can look at it, and then compare how my particular health care solution would play in it, as compared to Obamacare. In a television interview, HHS Secretary Tom Price said that Obamacare “may be working for Washington, it may be working for insurance companies, but it’s not working for patients.” Maybe it is time to consider patients’ involvement in the preparation of an Obamacare alternative? It could be that Obamacare repeal failed just because it has been prepared by Washington with consultation from insurance companies. Let us start with addressing 19 health care issues that politicians avoid talking about.

More
How to pay for the wall?
Apr 04, 2017

If you want to build the wall, pay for it with your own money. How much of your own money are you willing to donate? Trump received 62,979,879 votes. If each of Trump’s supporters voluntarily donates at least $1,000, which corresponds to about $42 per month for the next two years, and if we encourage those who are more affluent to double their donations, then Trump can have on hand about $100 billion, which may suffice for a substantial piece of the wall. Hence, all of you who are talking loudly about spending my money on building this wall, stay away from my wallet, but open your own wallet and send money to the “Build the Wall Fund.” Put your money where your mouth is.

More
What is wrong with Russia?
Dec 22, 2015

It appears that Russian leaders cannot free themselves from the medieval concept of regional influence, where weaker neighbors were subdued into becoming serf states. Is anyone capable of explaining to them that in these times of a global economy, any influence comes from economic strength? Russia, thanks to its size, natural resources and well-educated labor force, has everything that it takes to maintain a dominant position in the region, just by maintaining free trade with all its neighbors. It can do so without military interventions in Georgia and in Ukraine. Russia has everything that it takes to be a respected wealthier neighbor, to whom everyone in the region would turn for help when needed. Instead, it is a bully and a hooligan. It would take so little to change that. But it is so hard for Russia to do it. 

More
Closed mind for closed borders
Nov 19, 2015

Known to some as a libertarian, Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. speaks against open borders. His argument is that it is an infraction against private property. He misses the point that most people migrate just because Mr. Rockwell’s neighbors want them on their private property – for picking apples, washing the dishes or writing a computer code. Then, Mr. Rockwell wrongly laments that those foreigners invited by his neighbors violate his private property rights by loitering in the public spaces that he frequents. He wants the government to deny the rights of his neighbors to do on their private property whatever they wish, so he will not need to face immigrants in the public spaces. Mr. Rockwell left the train called “liberty” at the station called “xenophobia.”    

More
They do not know…
Sep 14, 2015

Mr. Trump says: “A lot of what I’m doing is by instinct.” I prefer that our President would make decisions based on systematic due diligence. The instinct that guides Mr. Trump in his professional life arrives from his vast experience, starting when he was growing up under the mentoring of his successful father, followed by a solid education and years of practice. Mr. Trump's confidence is misguiding, as it gives his supporters the illusion that someone who mastered real estate dealing can be equally skillful as President. It is similar to the illusion surrounding Dr. Carson, that he can be as good a President as he is a brain surgeon. If both gentlemen were humbler, they would realize that they qualify to be President equally as much as Mr. Trump qualifies to conduct brain surgeries and Dr. Carson to run Mr. Trump’s real estate empire. The problem is not that they do not know many things they should; the problem is that they do not realize that.

More
More Comments

Is Russia an evil empire?

Image by azazelok from Pixabay

That question comes up in conversations about the current crisis in Ukraine.

Young readers may need an explanation. In March 1983, in a speech to evangelicals, President Ronald Reagan talked about American values, stating that it would be a mistake to remove ourselves “from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil.” In that context, he mentioned “an evil empire,” revealing no names, but it was obvious that he was talking about the Soviet Union. It made history. As one might expect, critics were as vocal as supporters.

Was Reagan right calling the Soviet system evil?

The Reagan speech happened about three months after martial law was established in my native Poland, then in the Soviet Bloc. We saw a connection. Our memories of nine coal miners killed in Katowice, near where I lived, were still fresh; 10,000 people were detained, the curfew was still on, travel was restricted, and the use of phones was limited. We were under evil forces. Like most people I knew, I had my share of that national suffering. For us, Reagan’s speech was uplifting. We felt he understood our situation. And we rejoiced in those gloomy days seeing the Soviets upset.

In his Medium article “Western Blame For Escalating Tensions in The Ukraine,” Erik Engheim, who is Norwegian, writes: “When I grew up in the 1980s, I did not get presented with the USSR as the Evil Empire, as Ronald Reagan characterized it.” (For the record, in 2014, Time magazine acknowledged that using “the” in Ukraine’s name “denies their independence, denies their sovereignty.”) From Erik’s LinkedIn profile, one can conclude that Eric was at kindergarten age during Reagan’s speech. I suspect that whatever he might have heard about the Soviet Union as a child was not rooted in a knowledge of the Soviet system but a dislike of Reagan’s guts and the United States in general.

Erik inherited that dislike of capitalism and the United States as its leading force. At the opening, Erik assures us of his objectivity by writing: “Putin is an oppressive autocrat.” But Eric is concerned that the Russian perspective is not heard in the Western media. He is wrong. American right-wing pundits and politicians honk their grasp of the Russian position. Erik found himself aligning with intellectuals like Tucker Carlson from Fox News.

I suspect that if the Biden administration took a softer, more pro-Russian approach, the same right-wing extreme would stand for Ukraine. Reagan is dead, so are politics guided by “right and wrong and good and evil.” Today, adversaries are always wrong. Politicians and pundits who stand for Russia and against Ukraine show no moral spine; they only care about weakening their opponents.

Should Russia disassociate itself from the Soviet tradition?

In his article, Erik does not differentiate between the Soviet Union and Russia. In his defense, when I lived in Poland, we saw the Soviet Union as a vehicle for Russian imperial expansion. But the official line was that the Soviet Union was a blessing for humankind. It just happened that Russia, as the largest member of the Union, took a leadership position.

When the Soviet Union fell apart in 1991, that distinction gained a novel validity. With its new borders, Russia abandoned the imperial ambitions of the Soviet Union and claimed intentions of becoming a respectful partner in the community of nations.

It did not last long. A few years after becoming the Russian president in 1999, on multiple occasions, Vladimir Putin lamented the collapse of the Soviet Union as “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century.” He called it the “demise of ‘historical Russia.’” Those sentiments were a red flag for countries that previously were part of the Soviet Union or the Soviet Bloc. Ukraine, with its checkered history, became Putin’s obsession.

Like most Westerners, Erik does not know Russia

Trying to explain the Russian point of view, Erik mentions some unessential historical events. He misses the critical one. It is 240 years of the Tatar Yoke, the ruthless totalitarian regime. In my previous article, “Why do most Westerners misunderstand Russia?” I explain how that history manifests itself in the present Russian political concepts. 

Erik senses that Russians have some issues, but he could not pinpoint the problem. He calls Russia a “misguided neighbor.” So, how misguided is it? As misguided as those three guys from Georgia who know that slavery was bad and black people are equal but have difficulty comprehending that a young black man could jog in their neighborhood unchecked. Like these three men from Georgia, traditional Russian nationalists agree that nations should have the right to be independent. Still, they have problems accepting that Ukraine could run its economic affairs without Russian guidance.

It is about freedom

In his reasoning, Erik cites evil deeds by the United States and says that nobody is perfect. Why should we pick up on Russia? Regardless of where we came from, our past is not great. Atrocities happened everywhere, so did the good things. The world we live in today is much better than ever before. We face the same choices Reagan talked about way back, between right and wrong and good and evil. Those are choices between ideas that made the world more just and prosperous and those that hold us back.

The current political order in the West is based on the moral concept that all men are equal. That system is imperfect because humans are imperfect. We see as immoral the system that is rooted in the medieval Golden Horde traditions that a superior man has a right to impose his rule on others. We disagree with those Russians who directly or implicitly demand superiority over their neighbor nations.

It boils down to freedom. For most Westerners, like Erik, their personal liberty and the freedom of their communities and nations are there. Generations back, some people fought for it. No one questions them now; there is nothing to talk about.

Like most Westerners, Erik cannot put himself in the shoes of people like me who had their freedom brutally restricted. He cannot understand Ukrainians who want the freedom to prosper.

Answering the question posed in the title of this article, I say it is not our call to decide. It is for Russians to choose.

Leave a Reply

About me

I was born in 1951 in Gdansk, Poland.
Since my high school years, I have interest in politics and love for writing. During my college years, I started writing to student papers and soon became freelance author to major Polish political magazines.

In 1980 I wrote a book “Czy w Polsce może być lepiej?” (“Could it be better in Poland?” – this book is available only in Polish) analyzing major problems in Poland at the time and outlining possible solutions.

I was among those Polish political writers who by their writings contributed to the peaceful system transformation that finally took place in 1989. Since 1985, I live in the Chicago area. I went through the hard times typical of many immigrants. Working in service business, I have seen the best and the worst places, I met the poorest and the richest. I have seen and experienced America not known to most of politicians, business people, and other political writers. For eleven years, I ran my own company. Presently, I am an independent consultant.

My political writing comes out of necessity. I write when I see that the prevailing voices on the political arena are misleading or erroneous. Abstract mathematics and control theory (of complex technological processes) strongly influenced my understanding of social phenomena. In the past, my opponents rebuked my mathematical mind as cold, soulless, and inhuman. On a few occasions I was prized for my engineer’s precision and logic.

I have a master’s degree in electronic engineering with a specialization in mathematical machines from Politechnika Gdańska (Technical University of Gdansk).

... more