The barbarian attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, killed 1195 Israelis. In response, Netanyahu launched a brutal war aimed at annihilating Hamas. Gaza became a pile of rubble. Israelis killed about 47,000 people in Gaza and 4,000 in Lebanon. About 400 Israeli soldiers lost their lives executing that. What for? Hamas still stands; Israelis needed to accept a compromise to get a ceasefire and the return of the remaining hostages. Netanyahu lost. The simplest way to annihilate Hamas is by treating fairly Palestinians in the West Bank. The only way to end the conflict is to acknowledge that Jews turned Palestinians into refugees on their ancestral land.
On January 11, in his CNN show, Michael Smerconish asked, “Which is more to blame for the devastation of the California wildfires: climate change or government mismanagement of resources?” Out of 56,137 votes, 73.18% blamed climate change. Climate change or not, massive fires happen often in California. It could be that changes in climate make them more frequent and more severe. However, government officials should know that and prepare accordingly. Americans blaming climate change excused decrepit administrators in California and moved the blame to the federal government, expecting that it would spend all the money we have and all the money we can borrow to stop climate change. What would be cheaper and more effective in dealing with fires in California?
In today’s press conference, President-Elect Donald Trump listed many things we do not need to buy from Canada. I have the bad news for Mr. Trump: we buy them because they are cheaper. In many ways, Canada, considered more socialist, has a better functioning free market than the U.S. Its immigration policy is one example. Thanks to that, the supermarket in Chicago can get cheaper bread from Toronto than from the bakery next door. I noticed that years ago. So, instead of focusing on Canada, President Trump should reverse our purely socialist policies. Immigration could be a good start.
For a hammer, everything is a nail. Carlson Tucker’s interview with Tom Homan shows a decent cop trying to enforce our immigration laws, which are as good and as unenforceable as Prohibition. The same politicians voted in both in the early 1920s. Eliot Ness did not make Prohibition work.
People wishing to live in the U.S. come to the country illegally because it is the easiest way to obtain legal residence. Even the best police work by the Border Czar will not change it. Many will get hurt, but maybe Americans will realize that ending illegal immigration could be as easy as ending the menace of Prohibition — by repealing our immigration laws.
The media noticed that the public shows solidarity with Luigi Mangione and has little sympathy for Brian Thompson, the killed CEO of UnitedHealthcare, and his family. Many criticize it on moral grounds, rightfully so. The wrath of Americans is righteous. But even half-way sincere support for the killer does not bring us closer to solving the problem. It shows desperate frustrations with the status quo. Also, it tells us that Americans have no illusions that our elites are willing and able to fix our dysfunctional healthcare. And this is the real problem.
The media noted that even Trump opponents see potential benefits of DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency. It is an illusion.
The government’s spending is like a hundreds-head dragon that can grow new heads faster than DOGE can cut them off. The federal government is drowning in the bog of healthcare obligations. Medicare and Obamacare are the causes. But Trump promised not to touch those.
Immigration is the next quagmire. Replacing it with a guest workers policy would cut illegal immigration, allowing cuts on enforcement. Also, it would bring laborers, boosting the economy. However, Trump says there is no spending limit on enforcing with the greater determination the immigration policy that has never worked so far and never will.
A Russian propagandist made a joke about Russia giving up nuclear weapons by sending them on rockets to the United States.
I remember a similar joke from 1971 when Leonid Brezhnev and Richard Nixon tested the newly upgraded hotline. Brezhnev said: “I saw the White House in my nightdream last night.” Nixon responded: ”What is unique about that?” “Above it was a red flag with a hammer and sickle on it,” Brezhnev replied. “It is an interesting coincidence,” Nixon said, “because, in my nightdream, I saw the Kremlin with the red flag above it and something written on that flag.” Curious, Brezhnev asked, “I understand the red flag, but what was written on it?” Nixon answered: “I could not figure it out because it was in Chinese.”
That joke is timely because, after the dust settles, China will be the real winner of the war in Ukraine. It might not rule in the Kremlin, but it could de facto control the big part of Siberia.
Putin always waved that he had atomic bombs. Now, he claims that he might use it if, thanks to the military help, Ukraine might defend itself from being conquered by Russia.
Putin needs to be told that the West is prepared. Our defense will most likely encounter rockets with nuclear weapons before they leave the Russian territory. But we are ready to accept that we might not intercept them all. However, our response will be swift and merciless. Russia, as we know it, will be no longer. In particular, it will be forever deprived of having any nuclear arsenal. I bet that in such a situation, even if Putin decides to press that red button, it will be after some reasonable people in Russia disconnect it from the launchpad. I hope our intelligence services have already arranged that.
At least, that is what the recent revelations about the behind-the-scenes American policy determining aid for Ukraine suggest. At the beginning of the war, then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley asked his Russian counterpart, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, “Under what conditions would you use nuclear weapons?”
Russians responded that they reserve “the right to use tactical nuclear weapons in the event of catastrophic battlefield loss.” In plain language, if Ukraine will be able to defend itself efficiently, Russia feels entitled to turn the war into a nuclear one.
So, American support has been to keep the war going but not allow Ukraine to win. People are dying, but the military-industrial complex has its heyday.
Elon Musk claims that he is ready to serve as the chief of the Department of Government Efficiency in the Trump administration. He forgot what he did when he had to improve Twitter’s performance after purchasing it. He fired about 80% of employees, and Twitter did not collapse.
After taking office as president of Argentina in December of 2023, Javier Milei did not create the Department of Government Efficiency either. He did the opposite; he dissolved 11 ministries and fired 15,000 government employees. As of June 2024, 55% of Argentinians are OK with that.
One does not improve efficiency by creating a new bureaucracy but by eliminating the existing one.
Musk knew that at Twitter but forgot it when veering into politics.
Many tell us what to think. I ask my readers to be skeptical. Question me and others. 
When Illinoisans were not paying attention, government employees voted for themselves lucrative pensions, not correlated with the actual contributions...
The barbarian attack by Hamas on October 7, 2023, killed 1195 Israelis. In response, Netanyahu launched a brutal war aimed at annihilating Hamas. Gaza became a pile of rubble. Israelis killed about 47,000 people in Gaza and 4,000 in Lebanon. About 400 Israeli soldiers lost their lives executing that. What for? Hamas still stands; Israelis needed to accept a compromise to get a ceasefire and the return of the remaining hostages. Netanyahu lost. The simplest way to annihilate Hamas is by treating fairly Palestinians in the West Bank. The only way to end the conflict is to acknowledge that Jews turned Palestinians into refugees on their ancestral land.
On January 11, in his CNN show, Michael Smerconish asked, “Which is more to blame for the devastation of the California wildfires: climate change or government mismanagement of resources?” Out of 56,137 votes, 73.18% blamed climate change. Climate change or not, massive fires happen often in California. It could be that changes in climate make them more frequent and more severe. However, government officials should know that and prepare accordingly. Americans blaming climate change excused decrepit administrators in California and moved the blame to the federal government, expecting that it would spend all the money we have and all the money we can borrow to stop climate change. What would be cheaper and more effective in dealing with fires in California?
In today’s press conference, President-Elect Donald Trump listed many things we do not need to buy from Canada. I have the bad news for Mr. Trump: we buy them because they are cheaper. In many ways, Canada, considered more socialist, has a better functioning free market than the U.S. Its immigration policy is one example. Thanks to that, the supermarket in Chicago can get cheaper bread from Toronto than from the bakery next door. I noticed that years ago. So, instead of focusing on Canada, President Trump should reverse our purely socialist policies. Immigration could be a good start.
For a hammer, everything is a nail. Carlson Tucker's interview with Tom Homan shows a decent cop trying to enforce our immigration laws, which are as good and as unenforceable as Prohibition. The same politicians voted in both in the early 1920s. Eliot Ness did not make Prohibition work. People wishing to live in the U.S. come to the country illegally because it is the easiest way to obtain legal residence. Even the best police work by the Border Czar will not change it. Many will get hurt, but maybe Americans will realize that ending illegal immigration could be as easy as ending the menace of Prohibition — by repealing our immigration laws.
The media noticed that the public shows solidarity with Luigi Mangione and has little sympathy for Brian Thompson, the killed CEO of UnitedHealthcare, and his family. Many criticize it on moral grounds, rightfully so. The wrath of Americans is righteous. But even half-way sincere support for the killer does not bring us closer to solving the problem. It shows desperate frustrations with the status quo. Also, it tells us that Americans have no illusions that our elites are willing and able to fix our dysfunctional healthcare. And this is the real problem.